Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Risk Assessment
Contact Us

Estimating the impact of grouping misclassification on risk prediction when using the relative potency factors method to assess mixtures risk

On this page:

  • Overview
  • Downloads
Environmental health risk assessments of chemical mixtures that rely on component approaches often begin by grouping the chemicals of concern according to toxicological similarity. Approaches that assume dose addition typically are used for groups of similarly-acting chemicals and those that assume response addition are used for groups of independently acting chemicals. Grouping criteria for similarity can include a common adverse outcome pathway (AOP) and similarly shaped dose-response curves, with the latter used in the relative potency factor (RPF) method for estimating mixture response. Independence of toxic action is generally assumed if there is evidence that the chemicals act by different mechanisms. Several questions arise about the potential for misclassification error in the mixture risk prediction. If a common AOP has been established, how much error could there be if the same dose-response curve shape is assumed for all chemicals, when the shapes truly differ and, conversely, what is the error potential if different shapes are assumed when they are not? In particular, how do those concerns impact the choice of index chemical and uncertainty of the RPF-estimated mixture response? What is the quantitative impact if dose additivity is assumed when complete or partial independence actually holds and vice versa? These concepts and implications will be presented with numerical examples in the context of uncertainty of the RPF-estimated mixture response, both regarding endpoint and numerical accuracy when representing the group.

Impact/Purpose

platform presentation abstract for Society of Toxicology annual meeting, March 2018

Citation

Swartout, Jeff. Estimating the impact of grouping misclassification on risk prediction when using the relative potency factors method to assess mixtures risk. Society of Toxicology, San Antonio, Texas, March 11 - 15, 2018.

Download(s)

  • GROUPING-MISCLASSIFICATION-ERROR ABSTRACT FOR SOT 2018 -SWARTOUT -1ST DRAFT.DOCX
  • GROUPING-MISCLASSIFICATION-ERROR ABSTRACT FOR SOT 2018 -SWARTOUT -2ND DRAFT.DOCX
  • TMRF_RICE FOR SWARTOUT _SOT ABSTRACT_7_13_17 GR.PDF (PDF)  (NA  pp, 68.1 KB, about PDF)
  • MISCLASSIFICATION ERROR ABSTRACT FOR SOT GR.DOCX
  • n/a
  • Risk Assessment Home
  • About Risk Assessment
  • Risk Recent Additions
  • Human Health Risk Assessment
  • Ecological Risk Assessment
  • Risk Advanced Search
    • Risk Publications
  • Risk Assessment Guidance
  • Risk Tools and Databases
  • Superfund Risk Assessment
  • Where you live
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on August 01, 2017
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshots
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Open Government
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions

Follow.