Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Risk Assessment
Contact Us

The utility of alternative models in particulate matter air pollution toxicology

On this page:

  • Overview
  • Downloads
Exposure to particulate matter (PM) air pollution is associated with an increased risk of adverse human health effects. As more attention is brought to bear on the problem of PM, traditional in vivo models struggle to keep up with the risk assessment challenges posed by the countless number of unique PM samples across air sheds with limited or no toxicity information. This review examines the utility of three higher throughput, alternative, in vivo animal models in PM toxicity research: Danio rerio (zebrafish), Caenorhabditis elegans (nematode), and Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly). These model organisms vary in basic biology, ease of handling, methods of exposure to PM, number and types of available assays, and the degree to which they mirror human biology and responsiveness, among other differences. The use of these models in PM research dates back over a decade, with assessments of the toxicity of various PM sources including traffic-related combustion emissions, wildland fire smoke, and coal fly ash. This article reviews the use of these alternative model organisms in PM toxicity studies, their biology, the various assays developed, and endpoints measured, their strengths and limitations, as well as their potential role in PM toxicity assessment and mechanistic research going forward.

Impact/Purpose

This review article explores the utility of alternative non-mammalian in vivo models in assessing the toxicity of particulate matter air pollution.  The use of such models may help expedite relative toxicity determinations of various PM sources and may help guide targeted inhalation studies in higher order models.

Citation

Smoot, J., S. Padilla, AND A. Farraj. The utility of alternative models in particulate matter air pollution toxicology. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS, 3:100077, (2022). [DOI: 10.1016/j.crtox.2022.100077]

Download(s)

DOI: The utility of alternative models in particulate matter air pollution toxicology
  • Risk Assessment Home
  • About Risk Assessment
  • Risk Recent Additions
  • Human Health Risk Assessment
  • Ecological Risk Assessment
  • Risk Advanced Search
    • Risk Publications
  • Risk Assessment Guidance
  • Risk Tools and Databases
  • Superfund Risk Assessment
  • Where you live
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on September 21, 2023
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshots
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Open Government
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions

Follow.