Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Risk Assessment
Contact Us

Comparison of historical redlining HOLC grade exposure assessment metrics for different spatial scales

On this page:

  • Overview
Background and Aim: Around the mid-1930s, the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC) ranked urban neighborhoods as least to most desirable in terms of perceived mortgage stability. When evaluating the impacts of this racist practice (i.e., redlining), studies have not evaluated potential misclassification to HOLC grades when individual-level locational information is unavailable. We evaluate how assignment of HOLC grades differs across spatial scales within five historically redlined cities in North Carolina (NC).   Methods:   Using geocoded NC birth records (2003-2015), we created and compared HOLC grade designations at spatial scales of individual residential address, census block group (CBG), census tract (CT), and ZIP code. At the 4 different scales, addresses were assigned HOLC grade A (Best), B (Still desirable), C (Declining), or D (Hazardous). For residential address, we used a “point-in-polygon” approach to assign geocoded addresses to an HOLC grade.  HOLC grade was assigned to CBG, CT, and ZIP code based on the grade of the HOLC polygon(s) covering the majority of the land area. We used Pearson correlation coefficients (rP) and ranked classifications (Kappa statistics) to compare the designations made at different spatial scales.   Results: Our analysis included 39330 residential addresses; 3311 (8.4%) in grade A, 5776 (14.7%) in grade B, 20204 (51.4%) in grade C, and 10039 (25.5%) in grade D. Assignments to HOLC grade using CBG or CT were well-correlated with HOLC grade using residential address (rP=0.77 for CT and rP=0.78 for CBG); correlations were lower for ZIP code (rP=0.56). The weighted kappa statistic showed a greater degree of agreement to HOLC designation when comparing CBG to residential address compared to CT or ZIP code (Figure 1).   Conclusions: This comparison of HOLC grade assignment metrics suggests that the use of CBG or CT, rather than residential address, may be feasible. The use of ZIP code is less feasible in North Carolina.  

Impact/Purpose

We evaluate how assignment of HOLC grades differs across spatial scales within five historically redlined cities in North Carolina (NC).

Citation

Luben, Tom, M. Jimenez, A. Wilkie, C. Gray, AND K. Rappazzo. Comparison of historical redlining HOLC grade exposure assessment metrics for different spatial scales. Society for Epidemiologic Research (SER) Annual Meeting, Portland, OR, June 13 - 16, 2023.
  • Risk Assessment Home
  • About Risk Assessment
  • Risk Recent Additions
  • Human Health Risk Assessment
  • Ecological Risk Assessment
  • Risk Advanced Search
    • Risk Publications
  • Risk Assessment Guidance
  • Risk Tools and Databases
  • Superfund Risk Assessment
  • Where you live
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on January 02, 2024
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshots
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Open Government
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions

Follow.