Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Risk Assessment
Contact Us

Challenges and progress in characterizing in vitro dosimetry for air-liquid interface exposures

On this page:

  • Overview
Inhalation is one of the three primary modes of chemical exposure, but key challenges in developing reproducible exposure systems with robust analytical dosimetry methods have limited the use of in vitro models for the assessment of inhalable chemicals. In vitro inhalation assays have been improved with air-liquid interface (ALI) exposure systems which allow direct cell-toxicant interactions, but these systems are complex and vary in their geometry, flow rates, and operational parameters. Physicochemical properties of the inhaled substance must be carefully considered when selecting an ALI exposure system, optimizing its operational parameters, and developing methods to characterize exposure conditions. For example, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and aerosols possess distinct transport and deposition mechanisms which complicate the reliability and reproducibility of deploying ALI exposure systems to screen diverse inhalable compounds without quantitative methods to assess exposures. Detection methods to quantify deposition are often missing in ALI studies, but when deposition is recorded, it is usually with a cell-free collection method (QCM, filter, etc). As an alternative approach, we aerosolized two fluorescent tracers (sodium fluorescein and rhodamine 6G) and developed methods to directly quantify deposition and cellular uptake on human bronchial epithelial cells grown at the ALI across multiple dynamic and static exposure systems, including the EPA ACCES, MedTec CelTox, and the VITROCELL Cloud α12. These fluorescent tracers revealed that particle deposition is highly variable within and across exposure systems, and cell-free collection methods did not reliably estimate cell deposition in many scenarios. Both tracers were also able to highlight differences in internal dose rates across different exposure methods and cell models utilized. Mucus retention decreased cellular uptake in differentiated primary human bronchial epithelial cultures (HBECs) compared to an immortalized cell line, indicating that further work is needed to determine how cell model selection may influence dosimetry. Overall, these results highlight opportunities to better characterize in vitro exposures and improve dosimetry methods for in vitro to in vivo extrapolation. [Abstract does not reflect views or policies of the U.S. EPA.]

Impact/Purpose

In vitro NAMs are increasingly being used for inhalation studies, but these studies rarely provide dose metrics that are required by risk assessors to determine human relevance. This presentation abstract will provide an update to the aerosol dosimetry conference on an ORD approach to quantify delivered doses in NAMS using in vitro airway cultures. 

Citation

Murray, J. Challenges and progress in characterizing in vitro dosimetry for air-liquid interface exposures. Fourth Aerosol Dosimetry Conf. – Inhaled Aerosol Dosimetry: Advances, Applications, and Impacts on Risk Assessments and Therapeutics, Irvine, CA, October 16 - 18, 2024.
  • Risk Assessment Home
  • About Risk Assessment
  • Risk Recent Additions
  • Human Health Risk Assessment
  • Ecological Risk Assessment
  • Risk Advanced Search
    • Risk Publications
  • Risk Assessment Guidance
  • Risk Tools and Databases
  • Superfund Risk Assessment
  • Where you live
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on November 22, 2024
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshots
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Open Government
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions

Follow.