Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Risk Assessment
Contact Us

Evaluating the impact of anatomical and physiological variability on human equivalent doses using PBPK models - Probabilistic Workshop 2024

On this page:

  • Overview
Addressing human anatomical and physiological variability is a crucial component of human health risk assessment of chemicals. Experts have recommended probabilistic chemical risk assessment paradigms in which distributional adjustment factors are used to account for various sources of uncertainty and variability, including variability in the pharmacokinetic behavior of a given substance in different humans. In practice, convenient assumptions about the distribution forms of adjustment factors and human equivalent doses (HEDs) are often used. Parameters such as tissue volumes and blood flows are likewise often assumed to be lognormally or normally distributed without evaluating empirical data for consistency with these forms. In this work, we performed dosimetric extrapolations using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for dichloromethane (DCM) and chloroform that incorporate uncertainty and variability to determine if the HEDs associated with such extrapolations are approximately lognormal and how they depend on the underlying distribution shapes chosen to represent model parameters. We accounted for uncertainty and variability in PBPK model parameters by randomly drawing their values from a variety of distribution types. We then performed reverse dosimetry to calculate HEDs based on animal points of departure for each set of sampled parameters. Corresponding samples of HEDs were tested to determine the impact of input parameter distributions on their central tendencies, extreme percentiles, and degree of conformance to lognormality. This work demonstrates that the measurable attributes of human variability should be considered more carefully and that generalized assumptions about parameter distribution shapes may lead to inaccurate estimates of extreme percentiles of HEDs.

Impact/Purpose

This Sub-Product includes materials (an abstract and presentation slides or poster) for a presentation for the Advancing Quantitative Analysis in Human Health Assessments through Probabilistic Methods Workshop poster session (held by US EPA ORD and NICEATM) October 7-8, 2024. The authors investigated how the shapes of human equivalent dose (HED) distributions were impacted when they made different assumptions about the distributions of model parameters in physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for dichloromethane and chloroform. Using the Royston and Jarque-Bera normality tests, they found that while some HED distributions were lognormal, this depended on the distributions chosen to represent parameter variability as well as the applied doses. We found that extreme quantiles were impacted the most but the level to which they were impacted varied. Overall, assumptions about human parameter distributions should be considered carefully.

Citation

Schacht, C., A. Meade, A. Bernstein, B. Prasad, P. Schlosser, H. Tran, AND D. Kapraun. Evaluating the impact of anatomical and physiological variability on human equivalent doses using PBPK models - Probabilistic Workshop 2024. Workshop: Advancing Quantitative Analysis in Human Health Assessments through Probabilistic Methods, Durham, NC, October 07 - 08, 2024.
  • Risk Assessment Home
  • About Risk Assessment
  • Risk Recent Additions
  • Human Health Risk Assessment
  • Ecological Risk Assessment
  • Risk Advanced Search
    • Risk Publications
  • Risk Assessment Guidance
  • Risk Tools and Databases
  • Superfund Risk Assessment
  • Where you live
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on January 30, 2025
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshots
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Open Government
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions

Follow.