EMPIRICAL COMPARISONS OF CARCINOGEN POTENCIES ACROSS SPECIES AND THEIR BEARING ON APPROPRIATE SCALING OF DOSES FOR RISK ASSESSMENT

Abstract

This chapter is adapted from the recent proposal by the Interagency Pharmacokinetics Group (IPG) advocating the adoption by the participating Federal regulatory agencies of a unified method of scaling daily administered amount of a carcinogenic agent in proportion to the 3/4 power of body weight. his dose-scaling approach was proposed as a default assumption, to be used when case-specific data are inadequate, to achieve presumed equal lifetime cancer risks in different mammalian species following lifetime exposure. n this chapter, the empirical investigations of how carcinogen potencies vary among species are reviewed and the implications for choice of a general risk assessment methodology for carcinogen dose scaling are discussed. he empirical data on comparative carcinogenic potencies in different species support the general practice of scaling rodent potencies to humans, and show that, on average, current methods perform rather well. he data are not of sufficient resolution, however, to distinguish between surface area and body weight dose scaling. he empirical investigations of variation in carcinogen potency across species, considered as a whole, are fully consistent with the proposal of the IPG.

Citation

Rhomberg, L. EMPIRICAL COMPARISONS OF CARCINOGEN POTENCIES ACROSS SPECIES AND THEIR BEARING ON APPROPRIATE SCALING OF DOSES FOR RISK ASSESSMENT. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., EPA/600/A-94/080 (NTIS PB94169935), 1994.

Additional Information

Project Officer: orenz Rhomberg

• EMPIRICAL COMPARISONS OF CARCINOGEN POTENCIES ACROSS SPECIES AND THEIR BEARING ON APPROPRIATE SCALING OF DOSES FOR RISK ASSESSMENT