Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Risk Assessment
Contact Us

When Indices of Condition Don't Tell Us About Wetland Function

On this page:

  • Overview
Wetland loss has been significant across the globe. Those that remain are vulnerable to the effects of surrounding land use and are in some cases subjected to biotic homogenization. To monitor the condition of these wetlands, we commonly focus on gathering information about their surrounding land use, onsite stressors, and vegetative communities. The question remains: are these good indicators of a wetland’s functions, such as those performed in full or in part by microbes? We investigated this question in headwater wetlands of Pennsylvania and Ohio, focusing on pools and fluxes of the carbon and nitrogen that regulate water quality and climate change. While some pool (e.g., carbon storage) and flux (e.g., soil 15N) measurements were correlated with condition gradients derived from land use and onsite characterizations, rarely did we find congruence across regions (e.g., carbon accretion) Many functions fail to be explained without first accounting for other landscape gradients (e.g., soil texture’s effects on denitrification). Given these findings we ask, are there innovative ways for monitoring function that can be implemented in our monitoring programs in the future?

Impact/Purpose

Ecologists in the wetland community have long debated whether information about surrounding land use, onsite stressors, and vegetative communities used to define wetland condition relate to wetland function. In this study, we investigated pools and fluxes of carbon and nitrogen, important to the wetland functions of water quality regulation and climate amelioration, in headwater wetlands of Pennsylvania and Ohio. In addition, we collected information from each wetland to determine condition. We found that some pool (e.g., carbon storage) and flux (e.g., soil 15N) measurements were correlated with wetland condition gradients derived from land use and onsite characterizations; however, for some measurements, like carbon accretion, we rarely found congruence across regions. Furthermore, many functions fail to be explained without first accounting for other landscape gradients (e.g., soil texture’s effects on denitrification). We hope to inform monitoring programs with innovative ways for monitoring function, in addition to condition, in the future.

Citation

Moon, J., D. Wardrop, M. Fennessy, H. Ingram, AND A. Nahlik. When Indices of Condition Don't Tell Us About Wetland Function. Society for Freshwater Science Annual Meeting, NA, Virtual, May 23 - 27, 2021.
  • Risk Assessment Home
  • About Risk Assessment
  • Risk Recent Additions
  • Human Health Risk Assessment
  • Ecological Risk Assessment
  • Risk Advanced Search
    • Risk Publications
  • Risk Assessment Guidance
  • Risk Tools and Databases
  • Superfund Risk Assessment
  • Where you live
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on August 10, 2021
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshots
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Open Government
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions

Follow.