Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Risk Assessment
Contact Us

Comparative Assessment of the Impacts of Prescribed Fire Versus Wildfire (CAIF): A Case Study in the Western US (Presentation)

On this page:

  • Overview
  • Downloads
In January 2020, the Wildland Fire Leadership Council’s (WFLC) requested that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conduct an assessment of the health impacts of prescribed fire versus wildfire. Building off this request, EPA actively engaged with the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), Department of the Interior (DOI) (including the bureaus), and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to plan and develop the CAIF report, and in the process foster interagency connections that previously did not exist. The CAIF Report consists of a framework to not only discuss different fire management strategies, but also a novel modeling component that allows for a quantitative comparison of the air quality and health impacts attributed to smoke from each. Through two case studies, this assessment quantitatively estimates the air quality and health impacts associated with the actual case study fires, hypothetical fires based on different fire management strategies, and prescribed fires.

Impact/Purpose

At the request of the Wildland Fire Leadership Council (WFLC) EPA was asked to lead and conduct an assessment to examine the air quality and health impacts of smoke from wildland fire titled A Comparative Assessment of the Impacts of Prescribed Fire Versus Wildfire (CAIF): A Case Study in the Western U.S. The CAIR Report was developed in collaboration with USFS, DOI, and NIST. This presentation represents a second progress update and a complete overview of the draft report, including draft results and key insights, that is being submitted for a letter peer review.

Citation

Cascio, W. AND J. Sacks. Comparative Assessment of the Impacts of Prescribed Fire Versus Wildfire (CAIF): A Case Study in the Western US (Presentation). Wildland Fire Leadership Council (WFLC), Virtual, N/A, April 08, 2021.

Download(s)

  • Comparative Assessment of the Impacts of Prescribed Fire Versus Wildfire (CAIF): A Case Study in the Western U.S. (Progress Update Apr 2021) (PDF)  (37  pp, 3.3 MB, about PDF)
  • Risk Assessment Home
  • About Risk Assessment
  • Risk Recent Additions
  • Human Health Risk Assessment
  • Ecological Risk Assessment
  • Risk Advanced Search
    • Risk Publications
  • Risk Assessment Guidance
  • Risk Tools and Databases
  • Superfund Risk Assessment
  • Where you live
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on February 07, 2022
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshots
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Open Government
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions

Follow.