Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Risk Assessment
Contact Us

Tree Trade-Offs in Stream Restoration: Impacts on Riparian Groundwater Quality

On this page:

  • Overview
  • Downloads
Riparian zones are a vital interface between land and stream and are often the focus of stream restoration efforts in urban areas to reduce nutrient pollution in waterways. Restoring degraded stream channels often includes major physical alteration of the riparian zone to reshape streambank topography leading to the removal of mature trees. This study assessed the impact of tree removal on riparian groundwater quality over space and time. Twenty-nine wells were installed across 5 sites in watersheds of the Washington D.C. and Baltimore metropolitan areas in Maryland. Study sites encompassed a range in restoration ages (5, 10 and 20 years) as well as unrestored comparisons. Groundwater wells were installed as transects of 3 perpendicular to the stream channel to estimate nutrient uptake along groundwater flow paths. Well and stream water samples collected over a 2-year period (2018-2019) were analyzed for concentrations of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), total dissolved nitrogen (TDN), and dissolved components of boron (B), calcium (Ca), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), sodium (Na), and sulfur (S). Results showed some interesting patterns such as: (1) significantly increased mean concentrations of some nutrients and carbon in riparian groundwater for at least 5 years following tree removal then subsequent decline with recovery; (2) maximum TDN, DOC, and S concentrations at 5-year cut sites (20.5, 51.92, and 43.8 mg/L respectively) were higher than maximum TDN, DOC, and S concentrations at nearby comparison uncut sites (2.65, 18.53, and 14.1 mg/L respectively); (3) decreasing linear trends in concentrations of TDN, K and S during a 2 year shift from wet to dry conditions (p-value < 0.0001); (4) strong linear relationships between DOC (organic matter) and plant nutrients across sites suggesting the importance of plant uptake and biomass as sources and sinks of nutrients (p<0.05); (5) increasing concentrations along hydrologic flow paths from uplands to streams in riparian zones where trees were recently cut, and opposite patterns where trees were not cut. Riparian zones appeared to act as sources or sinks of bioreactive elements based on tree removal. Mean TDN, DOC, and S, concentrations decreased by 78.6%, 12.3%, and 19.3% respectively through uncut riparian zones, but increased by 516.9%, 199.7%, and 34.5% respectively through the 5-year cut transects. In contrast, concentrations of elements that are nonessential plant nutrients (e.g., Na and trace metals) did not share similar spatial or temporal patterns with the most bioreactive elements. Like other studies, results from this study showed that riparian tree removal can disturb multiple chemical constituents for the first few years after construction leading to significant groundwater quality impacts. However, this study also observed ecosystem recovery and an improvement in groundwater quality by 10-20 years after restoration. These effects of tree removal should be considered in cost-benefit analyses of restoration projects and where possible mature trees and soil profiles should be conserved. Overall, a more holistic understanding of the effects of riparian tree removal on groundwater quality can inform strategies for minimizing unintended negative consequences of stream restoration.

Impact/Purpose

Riparian zones are a vital interface between land and stream and are often the focus of stream restoration efforts in urban areas to reduce nutrient pollution in waterways. During stream restoration in urban ecosystems, trees are often removed from riparian zones to accommodate channel modification and heavy equipment access. This study assessed the impact of tree removal on riparian groundwater quality over space and time. Groundwater and stream water samples collected over 2 years across 5 study sites in Washington DC and Baltimore, ages 5, 10, and 20 years post-restoration, and analyzed for a suite of nutrients and heavy metals. Results showed increased concentrations of some nutrients and carbon in riparian groundwater for at least 5 years following tree removal but then declined after 20 year of recovery. Riparian zones appeared to act as sources or sinks of bioreactive elements depending on time since tree removal. This study showed that riparian tree removal can lead to significant groundwater quality impacts. However, groundwater quality improved 10-20 years after restoration. These effects of tree removal should be considered in cost-benefit analyses of restoration projects and where possible mature trees and soil profiles should be conserved.

Citation

Wood, K., S. Kaushal, P. Vidon, P. Mayer, AND J. Galella. Tree Trade-Offs in Stream Restoration: Impacts on Riparian Groundwater Quality. Springer Science+Business Media B.V, Dordrecht, NETHERLANDS, 25:773-795, (2022). [DOI: 10.1007/s11252-021-01182-8]

Download(s)

DOI: Tree Trade-Offs in Stream Restoration: Impacts on Riparian Groundwater Quality
  • Risk Assessment Home
  • About Risk Assessment
  • Risk Recent Additions
  • Human Health Risk Assessment
  • Ecological Risk Assessment
  • Risk Advanced Search
    • Risk Publications
  • Risk Assessment Guidance
  • Risk Tools and Databases
  • Superfund Risk Assessment
  • Where you live
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on September 21, 2022
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshots
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Open Government
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions

Follow.