Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Risk Assessment
Contact Us

Characterizing localized nitrogen sensitivity of tree species and the associated influences of mediating factors

On this page:

  • Overview
  • Downloads
Critical loads (CLs) are frequently used to quantify terrestrial ecosystem impacts from nitrogen (N) deposition using ecological responses such as the growth and mortality of tree species. Typically, CLs are reported as a single value, with uncertainty, for an indicator across a species' entire range. Mediating factors such as climate and soil conditions can influence species' sensitivity to N, but the magnitudes of these effects are rarely calculated explicitly. Here, we quantify the spatial variability and estimation error in N CLs for the growth and survival of 10 different tree species while accounting for key environmental factors that mediate species sensitivity to N (e.g., soil characteristics). We used a bootstrapped machine learning approach to determine the level of N deposition at which a 1% decrease occurs in growth rate or survival probability at forest plot locations across the United States. We found minimal differences (<5 kg N ha−1 year−1) when comparing a single species' CLs across climatic regimes but found considerable variability in species' local N CLs (>8.5 kg N ha−1 year−1) within these regimes. We also evaluated the most important factors for predicting tree growth rates and mortality and found that climate, competition, and air pollution generally have the greatest influence on growth rates and survival probability. Lastly, we developed a new probability of exceedance metric for each species and found high likelihoods of exceedance across large portions (46%) of some species' ranges. Our analysis demonstrates that machine learning approaches provide a unique capability to: (1) quantify mediating factor influences on N sensitivity of trees, (2) estimate the error in local N CL estimates, and (3) generate localized N CLs with probabilities of exceedance for tree species.

Impact/Purpose

Atmospheric deposition of nitrogen (N) continues to impact natural resources such as forests despite significant improvements in emissions of N and S in the past few decades. Critical loads (CLs) are frequently used to quantify terrestrial ecosystem impacts from N deposition using ecological responses such as the growth and mortality of tree species. Typically, CLs are reported as a single value for an indicator across a species’ entire range, despite the fact that mediating factors such as climate and soil conditions can influence species’ sensitivity to N. Here, we used a bootstrapped machine learning approach to quantify the spatial variability and estimation error in N CLs for the growth and survival of 10 different tree species. We found minimal differences (<5 kg N ha−1 year−1) when comparing a single species’ CLs across climatic regimes but found considerable variability in species’ local N CLs (>8.5 kg N ha−1 year−1) within these regimes. These findings suggest that some local populations of a species may be experiencing an exceedance even when the average CL is not exceeded, with implications for air quality and land managers across the U.S.

Citation

Coughlin, J., S. Chang, K. Craig, C. Scarborough, C. Driscoll, C. Clark, AND N. Pavlovic. Characterizing localized nitrogen sensitivity of tree species and the associated influences of mediating factors. ESA Journals, 15(7):e4925, (2024). [DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.4925]

Download(s)

DOI: Characterizing localized nitrogen sensitivity of tree species and the associated influences of mediating factors
  • Risk Assessment Home
  • About Risk Assessment
  • Risk Recent Additions
  • Human Health Risk Assessment
  • Ecological Risk Assessment
  • Risk Advanced Search
    • Risk Publications
  • Risk Assessment Guidance
  • Risk Tools and Databases
  • Superfund Risk Assessment
  • Where you live
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on August 19, 2024
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshots
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Open Government
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions

Follow.