Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Risk Assessment
Contact Us

Wood Predictors in Neotropical Streams: Assessing the Effects of Regional and Local Controls in Amazon and Cerrado Catchments.

On this page:

  • Overview
  • Downloads
Large wood plays a critical role providing complex habitat structure in rivers and streams. The instream wood regime consists of wood recruitment, transport, retention, and decay in river corridors. In tropical streams, transport and decay are thought to be the dominant influences on the amount of instream wood stored, and these are driven by upstream forest cover, as well as catchment hydroclimatic and geomorphic characteristics. Lack of studies of the tropical wood regime leave many uncertainties. Notably, the wood regimes in the neotropical Amazon and Cerrado biomes are not known, and rapidly changing land use threatens efforts to understand their natural wood regime. We investigated predictors of instream wood in catchments of the Amazon and Cerrado subject to a wide range of agricultural land use to identify the critical factors controlling wood recruitment and load. Using the structural equation modelling technique, we disentangled the complex net of regional and local controls. Contrary to our expectations, local drivers—such as the relation between the piece size and channel dimensions, discharge, stream power, and riparian forest—were the most important predictors of instream wood. The amounts of wood found in these streams were primarily the result of the wood delivered by the local riparian forest and how much of that wood remains trapped. Therefore, the preservation of the forested riparian zones in Amazon and Cerrado streams is crucial for maintaining the sources of wood as well as the channel morphology capable of trapping and retaining instream wood. Further research should compare reference and disturbed streams to quantify the influence of anthropogenic activities on instream wood and its primary influences. This information would facilitate assessing the extent of human alteration and developing mitigating measures to arrest or reverse changes that reduce instream wood and degrade aquatic and riparian habitat in neotropical rivers and streams.

Impact/Purpose

Historic and recent accelerated trends in conversion from forested uplands and riparian areas to agricultural and grazing have had profound impact on the habitat quality, water quality, and biodiversity of streams world-wide. Despite the importance of tropical, and especially neotropical streams as hotspots of biodiversity, regional assessments of physical habitat supporting biodiversity in these streams remain sparse. Studies that examine the geoclimatic and anthropogenic factors that control and influence the stream physical habitat that supports the biodiversity of this region are even more sparse. Large in-stream wood derived from forested riparian and upland areas is critical to creating and maintaining physical habitat complexity in stream channels globally. As such, changes in the amount of large wood in streams are perhaps the most important path of habitat degradation, but also remain one of the most promising avenues of habitat rehabilitation. For stream habitat protection and rehabilitation efforts to be effective, it is essential that we understand the factors controlling the amount of in-stream wood. In the research described in this manuscript, Saraiva and co-authors examined data from 258 stream reaches sampled using EPA’s NARS field methods over a range of agricultural land use within the tropical Amazon rainforest and the Cerrado (savannah) in Brazil. They used Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) to identify the critical factors controlling wood recruitment, transport, and decomposition within the stream channels. Their results indicate that the wood budget in neotropical streams impacted by agricultural activities is dominated by transport out of the stream reach rather than transport into the reach. Regional variation in the amount of instream wood among streams was more strongly influenced by differences in transport than by differences in the amount of recruitment. Specifically, transport of wood recruited from the local riparian forest along these streams was controlled primarily by channel dimensions and the size of wood pieces relative to the channel size. Land use effects were manifested in changes in transport related to hydro alteration, channel incision, and the size of wood pieces entering the streams. Aside from the value of this research to water resource management in neotropical streams, it demonstrates the utility of the NARS physical habitat assessment methodology for examining likely regional and instream mechanisms controlling and influencing physical habitat in streams at large spatial scales.

Citation

Saraiva, S., P. Kaufmann, I. Rutherfurd, C. Leal, R. Leitao, D. Macedo, AND P. Pompeu. Wood Predictors in Neotropical Streams: Assessing the Effects of Regional and Local Controls in Amazon and Cerrado Catchments. John Wiley & Sons Incorporated, New York, NY, 48(3):613-630, (2023). [DOI: 10.1002/esp.5506]

Download(s)

DOI: Wood Predictors in Neotropical Streams: Assessing the Effects of Regional and Local Controls in Amazon and Cerrado Catchments.
  • Risk Assessment Home
  • About Risk Assessment
  • Risk Recent Additions
  • Human Health Risk Assessment
  • Ecological Risk Assessment
  • Risk Advanced Search
    • Risk Publications
  • Risk Assessment Guidance
  • Risk Tools and Databases
  • Superfund Risk Assessment
  • Where you live
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on August 30, 2024
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshots
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Open Government
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions

Follow.