Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Risk Assessment
Contact Us

Disagreement on Foundational Principles of Biological Aging

On this page:

  • Overview
  • Downloads
To gain insight into how researchers of aging perceive the process they study, we conducted a survey among experts in the field. While highlighting some common features of aging, the survey exposed broad disagreement on the foundational issues. What is aging? What causes it? When does it begin? What constitutes rejuvenation? Not only was there no consensus on these and other core questions, but none of the questions received a majority opinion—even regarding the need for consensus itself. Despite many researchers believing they understand aging, their understanding diverges considerably. Importantly, as different processes are labeled as “aging” by researchers, different experimental approaches are prioritized. The survey shed light on the need to better define which aging processes this field should target and what its goals are. It also allowed us to categorize contemporary views on aging and rejuvenation, revealing critical, yet largely unanswered, questions that appear disconnected from the current research focus. Finally, we discuss ways to address the disagreement, which we hope will ultimately aid progress in the field.  

Impact/Purpose

This manuscript describes the consensus (or lack thereof) on foundational principles of aging and thus the need to better understand aging from both a scientific and philosophical perspective.

Citation

Ward-Caviness, C., V. Gladyshev, B. Anderson, H. Barlit, B. Barre, S. Beck, B. Behrouz, D. Belsky, A. Choix, M. Chamolie, B. Chen, K. Cheng, J. Chuprin, G. Churchill, A. Cipriano, A. Colville, J. Deelen, Y. Deigin, K. Edmonds, B. English, R. Fang, M. Florea, I. Gershteyn, D. Gilll, L. Goetz, V. Gorbunova, P. Griffin, S. Horvath, M. Jensen, X. Jin, S. Jovanovska, K. Kajderowicz, T. Kashahara, C. Kerepes, S. Kulkarm, V. Labunskyy, M. Levine, S. Libert, J. Lu, Y. Lu, B. McCoy, R. Marioni, W. Mitchell, M. Mogri, F. Nasirian, P. Niimi, H. Oh, B. Okundaye, A. Parkhitko, L. Peshkinn, M. Petljak, J. Poganik, G. Pridham, D. Promislow, AND W. Prusisz. Disagreement on Foundational Principles of Biological Aging. Oxford University Press, OXFORD, UK, 3(12):499, (2024). [DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae499]

Download(s)

DOI: Disagreement on Foundational Principles of Biological Aging
  • Risk Assessment Home
  • About Risk Assessment
  • Risk Recent Additions
  • Human Health Risk Assessment
  • Ecological Risk Assessment
  • Risk Advanced Search
    • Risk Publications
  • Risk Assessment Guidance
  • Risk Tools and Databases
  • Superfund Risk Assessment
  • Where you live
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on June 10, 2025
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshots
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Open Government
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions

Follow.