Biological Activity in U.S. Food Processing Plant Effluent
On this page:
Commercial food, beverage, and feedstock processing facilities produce wastewater with complex mixtures that are a probable source of bioactive contaminants. However, current monitoring of these wastewaters is primarily focused on basic constituents including pH, dissolved oxygen, and suspended solids. Therefore we measured organic compound (580 Phase I and 700 Phase II) concentrations and biological activity in a two-phase study of wastewater effluent from 23 food processing facilities accross the United States. Samples were assessed for estrogenic, androgenic, glucocorticoid, and peroxisome proliferator-activated (PPAR; α and γ) receptor activity and for activation of 24 additional nuclear receptors and 52 transcription factor signatures using the multi-endpoint Attagene Trans-FACTORIALTM and Cis-FACTORIALTM assays, respectively. Effluent samples from each site (23/23) contained estrogenic activity (0.05 – 1.62; median: 0.26 ng E2Eq/L) and 10/23 contained estrogenic activity levels at which adverse effects may occur in aquatic species after chronic exposure. Androgenic activity was detected in 9/23 (0.19 – 8.41; median: 0.32 ng DHTEq/L) but no glucocorticoid or PPAR α/γ activity was detected in any sample above method detection limits (MDL). Attagene analysis corroborated single endpoint bioassay results indicating estrogenic activity in a variety of effluent types. To further characterize environmental exposures in Phase II, effluent, along with stream water up and downstream from the outfall, bed sediment, and aquatic organisms were collected from a subset of Phase I sampling sites (7/23). Samples up and/or downstream from an ethyl alcohol manufacturing and soybean/oilseed processing facility produced estrogenic activity comparable to effluent concentrations. Samples downstream from a non-poultry meat processing and soybean/oilseed processing facility exhibited androgenic activity comparable to effluent concentrations. No biological activity was detected above MDL in sediment samples. Known estrogenic and androgenic chemical concentrations quantified using targeted analytical methods (HPLC/MS-MS) did not completely explain all measured biological activity, confirming the added value of bioassays in water quality screening applications. Future aquatic-species tissue analysis, may provide insight regarding potential effects of exposure to detected mixtures of biologically active contaminants. Abstract does not necessarily reflect USEPA views or policy.